Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Lowd

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 23, 1958PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSiddall, J.

This is an action on the case in the nature of special assumpsit brought to recover damages for breach of a written contract for the sale and removal of standing wood and timber. The defendants demurred to the plaintiffs’ declaration. The demurrer was overruled by the presiding justice, and exceptions were duly taken by the defendants.

The plaintiffs’ declaration reads as follows:

“1. In a plea of the case for that the said defendants on the 13th day of July, A. D. 1956, entered into a contract in writing with the Plaintiffs, duly signed and delivered, of which the following is a copy:

THIS IS A…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jacobson v. HendricksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  2. O'Sullivan v. OvertonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887
  3. Emerson v. ShoresSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1901
  4. Lawrence v. ChaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1866
  5. Banton v. ShoreySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1885

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Northeast Investment Co. v. Leisure Living Communities, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  2. Paullus v. YARBROUGH ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Roger Edwards, LLC. v. Fiddes & Son, Ltd.District Court, D. Maine · 2003
  4. Politelli v. GianfrancescoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1964
  5. Fitzpatrick v. Teleflex, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API