Legal Opinion

Ashworth v. Glover

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1967No. 10679PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*87HENRIOD, Justice:

Appeal from a no cause judgment, in an action where the plaintiff sued defendant in tort, not quasi-contract, for conversion of plans he had drawn. Reversed, with costs to- plaintiff A.

In 1960 A designed a drive-in restaurant for one Allen, who paid the former for his services. Allen thereafter expanded his business and built another drive-in, essentially identical in structure and design, save for plot and minor other changes,— within a radius of about 30 miles on a through highway. Allen continued to use A’s plans and his supervision of construction. On the occasion of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Taco Cabana International, Inc. v. Two Pesos, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  2. Seay v. VialpandoWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Nucor Corporation v. Tennessee Forging Steel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  4. Nucor Corporation v. Tennessee Forging Steel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  5. George M. Hedla, Etc. v. Blaine McCool Etc., George M. Hedla, Etc. v. Blaine McCool Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API