Legal Opinion

Shepard v. Midland Foods, Inc.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1983No. 82-395PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber

Claimant Shepard appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court that he was ineligible for further benefits. We reverse the Workers’ Compensation Court, and remand for a determination of compensation due, as well as fees, costs and penalties, if any.

Claimant presents half a dozen issues for review. The following issues are dispositive:

1. Whether there was substantial evidence to support the Workers’ Compensation Court’s determination that claimant’s knees had deteriorated (and eventually collapsed) because of other than work related reasons.

2. Whether there was substantial…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Steffes v. 93 Leasing Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Birnie v. UNITED STATES GYPSUM COMPANYMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Robins v. Anaconda Aluminum Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Rumsey v. Cardinal PetroleumMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Jones v. Bair's CafesMontana Supreme Court · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Crenshaw v. CrenshawMontana Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Marcott v. Louisiana Pacific Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Hash v. Montana SilversmithMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Welch v. American Mine Services, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Garcia v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API