Legal Opinion

Birnie v. UNITED STATES GYPSUM COMPANY

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1958No. 9818PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE BOTTOMLY:

This is an action under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, R.C.M. 1947, section 92-101 et seq.

There is no question but that the plaintiff, John Birnie, was injured in an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment by the United States Gypsum Company, in its plant at Heath, Montana, on December 30, 1954.

At the time of the accident Birnie was of the age of 70 years, married, his wife being his only dependent.

The United States Gypsum Company, a corporation, plaintiff’s employer, was enrolled under Plan No. 1 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of the State of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. Roundup Coal Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Birdwell v. Three Forks Portland Cement Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Gaffney v. Industrial Accident Board of MontanaMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Murphy v. the Anaconda Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Rathbun v. Taber Tank Lines, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Erhart v. Great Western Sugar CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Robins v. Anaconda Aluminum Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Bond v. St. Regis Paper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Rumsey v. Cardinal PetroleumMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Breen v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1968

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API