Legal Opinion

Hash v. Montana Silversmith

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1991No. 90-462PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDONOUGH

Carol Hash appeals from a judgment of the Workers’ Compensation Court, which held she failed to establish that she suffered a compensable back injury. The insurer, State Compensation Mutual Insurance Fund, has cross appealed the Workers’ Compensation Court’s judgment which held that Mrs. Hash suffered a compensable injury to her hands. We affirm.

The only issues we find necessary for review are:

1. Whether the Workers’ Compensation Court’s decision that Carol Hash failed to prove she suffered a compensable back injury is supported by substantial evidence;

2. Whether the Workers’ Compensation…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Steffes v. 93 Leasing Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Dumont v. Wickens Bros. Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Hoehne v. Granite Lumber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Viets v. Sweet Grass CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  5. O'BRIEN v. Central FeedsMontana Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. EBI/Orion Group v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Plainbull v. Transamerica InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Rueda v. Utah Labor Comm'nUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Hash v. Montana SilversmithMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Eastman v. Transport Insurance CompMontana Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API