Legal Opinion

Farley v. Edward E. Tower Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 26, 1930PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtField, J.

Sadie E. Farley, herein referred to as the plaintiff, brought three actions of tort against, respectively, Marie H. Dederick, herein referred to as the hairdresser, Edward E. Tower & Company, herein referred to as the dealer, and the Standard Pyroxoloid Corporation, herein referred to as the manufacturer, to recover for personal *233injuries alleged to have been sustained by her while having a “water wave” in a hair-dressing establishment conducted by the hairdresser. ■ The cases were tried together by a judge and a jury. In the action against the hairdresser there was a verdict for the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lake v. Atlantic WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  2. Guinan v. Famous Players-Lasky Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Stone v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  4. Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. DeselmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Wellington v. Downer Kerosene Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Woodling v. Garrett Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  3. Martin v. Bengue, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  4. Wolfe v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
  5. Marguerite Jamieson v. Woodward & LothropCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API