Berry Brothers Buick, Inc. v. General Motors Corporation (Buick Motor Division)
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
On review of the record we are of the opinion that the District Court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant, General Motors Corporation (Buick Motor Division), 1 in this action by Berry Brothers Buick, Inc., under the so-called Automobile Dealers’ Day in Court Act, 2 which was premised on the plaintiff’s contention that the defendant did not act in “good faith”, as that term is defined in the statute, in failing to renew its sales agency fran chise at the expiration of its term. See Globe Motors, Inc. v. Studebaker-Packard Corporation, 328 F.2d…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Globe Motors, Inc. v. Studebaker-Packard CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Berry Brothers Buick, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
- David H. Garvin v. American Motor Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
4Cited by7 opinions
- Fray Chevrolet Sales, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, and Donald E. Fray v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Kaiser v. General Motors Corp.(Pontiac Motor Div.)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Kirkland v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- H. C. Blackwell Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Kenworth Truck Company, a Division of Paccar, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Chinetti-Garthwaite Imports, Inc. v. Ferrari Societa Per Azioni Esercizio Fabbriche Automobili E CorseDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.