Legal Opinion

Berry Brothers Buick, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 18, 1966No. Civ. A. 32261PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, District Judge.

This is a motion for summary judgment brought by General Motors Corporation (Buick Motor Division) (Buick) in an action to recover damages for allegedly failing to act in good faith toward Berry Brothers Buick, Inc., in not renewing its franchise. 1 The complaint is based on the Automobile Dealers Suit Against Manufacturers Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1221-1225. 2

Arthur Berry and Archie W. Berry, twin brothers, were at all times together with their families co-principals in ownership of plaintiff. They were franchised Buick dealers from 1937 to 1960 first as a partnership,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Robin Construction Company, a Corporation of New Jersey, Richard D. Masia and Judith Masia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
  2. Volkswagen Interamericana, S.A. v. Henry RohlsenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
  3. Globe Motors, Inc. v. Studebaker-Packard CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
  4. Zigmund A. Milos, Individually and Trading as Milos Ford Sales v. Ford Motor Company and A. W. Kennedy Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
  5. David H. Garvin v. American Motor Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Overseas Motors, Inc. v. Import Motors Limited, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1974
  2. Edward C. Rea and 22 Ford Inc., a Corporation v. Ford Motor Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  3. Arnold Pontiac-Gmc, Inc. v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  4. Autowest, Inc. v. Peugeot, Inc., and Associete De Automobiles PeugeotCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  5. Hubbard Chevrolet Company, Cross-Appellant v. General Motors Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API