Selznick v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
This is a proceeding i o review a recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the State Bai of California that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for three years upon conditions of probation, including actual suspensior for six months and the making of restitution to clients in the sum of $1,000.
Petitioner was admitted to practice law in California in January 1947. He was previously disciplined here for having commingled and converted funds belonging to one of his client; ;
in the current proceeding petitioner was charged with violation of his oath and duties as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re BogartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Grove v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Simmons v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Eschwig v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Ridley v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BraswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Finch v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Finch v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Fitzpatrick v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Arden v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.