Legal Opinion
Autographic Register Co. v. Uarco, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 29, 1950No. 10006_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff charged defendant with infringement of its patents, Brenn 2,082,730, Johnson 2,258,573, Brenn 2,212,174 and Brenn 2,159,500. The District Court held each invalid and entered judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff appeals from so much of the judgment as declared invalid the first three patents.
With the arrival of the typewriter and related office machines, business practices in correspondence and recording took on new aspects. The old custom of making copies of written documents by hand or by letter-press was laid aside. In lieu thereof, business offices,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Reckendorfer v. FaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Thompson v. BoisselierSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Slawson v. Grand Street RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Akron Brass Company v. Elkhart Brass Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
- Autographic Register Co. v. Philip Hano Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
- Hamilton Mfg. Co. v. Illinois Surgical Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- Autographic Register Co. v. Philip Hano Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1951