Harrell v. Sagebrush of North Carolina, LLC
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
McCullough, Judge.
The sole issue before us on appeal is whether the trial court’s grant of a new trial pursuant to Rule 59 was proper. We reverse.
On 10 April 2003, Nancy F. Harrell (“plaintiff”) filed a complaint alleging that as a result of defendant’s negligence, she sustained damages and injuries in excess of $330,000. The case was tried at the 4 December 2006 Civil Session of Duplin County Superior Court. The evidence presented at trial tended to show the following: On 10 November 2002, plaintiff and her family lawfully visited a Dunn restaurant owned and operated by Sagebrush of North…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kinsey v. SpannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Goodman v. . GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Warren v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Miller v. . GreenwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Reeves v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harrell v. SAGEBRUSH OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
- Langwell v. Albemarle Family Practice, PllcCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010