Legal Opinion

Harrell v. Sagebrush of North Carolina, LLC

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 15, 2008No. COA07-1264PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCullough, Judge.

The sole issue before us on appeal is whether the trial court’s grant of a new trial pursuant to Rule 59 was proper. We reverse.

On 10 April 2003, Nancy F. Harrell (“plaintiff”) filed a complaint alleging that as a result of defendant’s negligence, she sustained damages and injuries in excess of $330,000. The case was tried at the 4 December 2006 Civil Session of Duplin County Superior Court. The evidence presented at trial tended to show the following: On 10 November 2002, plaintiff and her family lawfully visited a Dunn restaurant owned and operated by Sagebrush of North…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kinsey v. SpannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Goodman v. . GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Warren v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Miller v. . GreenwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Reeves v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harrell v. SAGEBRUSH OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Langwell v. Albemarle Family Practice, PllcCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API