Legal Opinion
Carlin v. Lifur
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 2, 1900No. Civ. No. 92PublishedCited by 6 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order refusing a new trial. D. K. Trask, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGray, P. J.
This action is brought to recover $1,000 as commission on the sale of certain land. The findings and judgment were in favor of the plaintiff in the sum claimed, and the defendant appeals from said judgment, and from an order denying him a new trial.
The complaint was based upon a written contract quoted as follows:
“Los Angeles, Cal., Jan. 14, 1903.
“Mr. W. H. Carlin.
“Dear Sir—I héreby authorize you to sell my land in section 17 and 18, Twp. 1 S. R. 12 W., S. B. M., containing 309 acres, at $125 per acre, and if sold by February 1, 1903, will give you a commission of $1,000.
“Yours, etc.
“M.…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Cochran v. EllsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Gilliland v. JaynesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Edgecomb v. CallahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Engel v. WilcoxNevada Supreme Court · 1959
- Richardson v. Walter Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.