Legal Opinion
Perry v. Norris
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided March 3, 1995No. PB-C-83-275PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EISELE, District Judge.
On January 17, 1990, Mr. Eugene Wallace Perry filed a “Supplemental Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus” on the ground that he was “awaiting execution, pursuant to a conviction obtained in violation of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.” He raises two claims for relief:
A. Newly discovered evidence that Marion Pruett, and not petitioner, committed the crime, entitles petitioner to a new trial as a matter of due process.
B. The trial court’s refusal to permit the issuance of subpoenas to compel the attendance of four out-of-state alibi witnesses…
2Cases cited86 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Marion Albert Pruett v. Larry Norris, Marion Albert Pruett v. Larry NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Eugene Wallace Perry v. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Eugene Wallace Perry v. Leroy BrownleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Perry v. BrownleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Eugene Wallace Perry v. Larry NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.