Legal Opinion

Cowman v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 8, 1959No. [No. 263, September Term, 1958.]PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.

This appeal is from an order committing the appellant to Patuxent Institution after a hearing before the court, without a jury, and a finding that the appellant was a defective delinquent under Code (1957), Art. 31B, sec. 9 (b). Although the point is not raised in either brief, it appears from the transcript that the trial court, upon petition and affidavit of the appellant that he was without funds, ordered that the transcript and costs of appeal be supplied by the State, and appointed counsel to represent the appellant on this appeal. We express no opinion on the propriety of this action,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eggleston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  2. Palmer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  3. McElroy v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Director of Patuxent Institution v. DANIELS OF PATUXENT INSTITUTIONCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  2. State v. MusgroveCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  3. Sas v. State of MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1969
  4. Johns v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  5. Weeder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API