Legal Opinion

Schleif v. Grigsby

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 31, 1927No. Docket No. 6022PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action for damages.

The action was tried by the court sitting with a jury, and the judgment followed the verdict returned. Defendant’s motion for a new trial was denied.

At the outset a résumé of the facts sufficient to present generally the controversy will be given, and further detail of fact will accompany each point urged.

On May 21, 1923, the plaintiff was engaged in moving some furniture and personal effects from a place of previous employment. He had loaded these goods upon a small truck…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Giraude v. Elec. Improvement Co. of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Davis v. California Street Cable RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Jacobson v. Oakland Meat & Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Anderson v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Ergo v. Merced Falls Gas & Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Lozano v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Andre v. AllynnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Mathias v. Denver Union Terminal Railway CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  5. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. SangerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API