Legal Opinion

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 25, 1966No. 16666PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellees Robert N. Miller and wife sued appellant, a brokerage company, for damages for alleged breach of contract and recovered judgment for $22,200. The facts of the case appear without substantial dispute.

Miller had been a customer of appellant for some time, having purchased through it several corporate shares and commodities “on margin.” These were held by appellant, which had advanced a substantial portion of the purchase price thereof, as collateral security. These securities are spoken of in the record as Miller’s, “long position,” and the excess of the value thereof over the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cooper v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. H. Sheffield & SonTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Bryant v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. SweeneyTexas Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Psg Co., a Corporation, and Philip S. Greenberg v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. EF Hutton & Co. v. HeimSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  3. Tark v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API