Legal Opinion

Ford New Holland, Inc. v. Thompson MacHine, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 3, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, Justice.

Defendant Thompson Machine, Inc., appeals from an order of the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Lipez, J.) granting the motion of plaintiff Ford New Holland, Inc., for a writ of replevin and bond. Thompson Machine argues that the bond is insufficient because it is not a surety bond. Ford New Holland contends that Thompson Machine’s appeal should be dismissed as an appeal from an interlocutory order. We agree that the bond is insufficient, and we vacate the order.

I

Ford New Holland obtained a perfected security interest in Thompson Machine’s entire inventory. Subsequently the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Erica B.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  2. Connors v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. Cook v. CookSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  4. Plumbago Mining Corp. v. SweattSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  5. Buckminster v. Acadia Village Resort, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Doughty v. SullivanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  2. Glynn v. City of South PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  3. CENTRIX BANK AND TRUST v. KehlSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  4. Child's Play Ltd. v. A & A, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API