Legal Opinion

Doughty v. Sullivan

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 7, 1995PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Justice.

Ethelyn Sullivan (Ethelyn) appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Brennan, J.) affirming the judgment entered in the District Court (Portland, Rogers, J.) in favor of Cecil Amos Doughty (Amos) on his complaint requesting a writ of replevin and damages for Ethelyn’s wrongful conversion of an 18-foot Pointer boat which Amos allegedly purchased from Neil Doughty (Neil). Ethelyn also appeals from a judgment entered in Neil’s favor on her third-party complaint alleging that Neil owed her $1,000. We vacate both judgments.

Background

The record…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Hart v. MoultonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Nika Corp. v. City of Kansas City, Mo.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984
  3. Southern Missouri Bank v. FogleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. AnaconeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1964
  5. Tozier v. TozierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. WillitsIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Sturtevant v. Town of WinthropSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  3. Ludington v. LaFreniereSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  4. Uncle Henry's Inc. v. Plaut Consulting Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2003
  5. In Re Stone & Webster, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API