Legal Opinion

Plumbago Mining Corp. v. Sweatt

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 21, 1982PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VIOLETTE, Justice.

In these two appeals, this Court is presented with an issue of first impression: the appropriate disposition of property illegally seized from the defendants in a criminal prosecution (Dale and Carol Sweatt) which, in two pending civil actions, is claimed to have been stolen from its alleged rightful owner (Plumbago Mining Corporation). We hold that under the unique circumstances of these eases the Superior Court erred in ordering, on the authority of our mandate in State v. Sweatt, Me., 427 A.2d 940 (1981), the property returned to the defendants, and victims of the illegal…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. The BANK OF THE UNITED STATES v. the Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  5. Haebler v. . MyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. Maine State Employees Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  2. Crafts v. QuinnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  3. Musson v. GodleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  4. Bank of Santa Fe v. Honey Boy Haven, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Bouchard v. FrostSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API