Hieber v. City of Spokane
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Huneke, J., entered April 15, 1912, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for damages to property by reason of obstructions in a street.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
This case grows out of the same state of facts as the case of Stern v. Spokane, ante p. 118, 131 Pac. 476. In this case, however, damages are not claimed because of the occupation- of the street, but “only for physical injuries to the building, the reasonable cost of repairing the same, and loss of rental value, only in the decrease in the fair rental values caused by the casting of smoke, cinders or grease or other substances on plaintiff’s property.” Appellant further says:
“This is a case for damages to the respondent’s building caused by the appellant in carrying on the work of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Smith v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
- Hase v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Lund v. Idaho & Washington Northern RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Keil v. Grays Harbor & Puget Sound Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Lincoln County v. BrockWashington Supreme Court · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jorguson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Armstrong v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- International Contract Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Taylor v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
- Schade Brewing Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.