Anderson v. Patten
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Linn District Court. — Hon. Milo P. Smith, Judge. Action in replevin for the possession of a buggy. There was a judgment for defendant, from which plaintiff appeals. —
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
— There were horse races at Marion July 4 and 5, 1910, and plaintiff was in attendance. He shipped three buggies in the same car with his horses and placed in charge of them one Willard,who arranged for the storage of two of them in a shop -and; after obtaining permission of the city authorities, exhibited the other near the park. Willard had accompanied plaintiff from Des Moines, where the latter had bought the buggies, in order to carry out a scheme entered into at the suggestion of Willard, and which is best explained by plaintiff:
The method of handling the coupons was this: There was a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hichhorn, Mack & Co. v. BradleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Kaufman Bros. v. Farley Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1889
- Hinkson v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
- Dispatch Printing Co. v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Wierman v. Bay City-Michigan Sugar Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Grismore v. Consolidated Products Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Chamberlain v. the Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1926
- A. C. Nelsen Auto Sales, Inc. v. TurnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
- Boylan v. WorkmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Chismore v. Marion Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.