Peterson v. Moran
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
HANSON, J. pro tem.
The question brought here for determination is whether the relation of master and servant between the parties here involved terminated instantly upon the discharge of the servant on the premises of the employer or whether the relation with respect to any injuries thereafter sustained by the servant continued until he left the premises, even though he did not proceed to leave them as quickly as he could have done. The answer, we think, depends entirely upon whether the servant’s delay in quitting the premises was unreasonably prolonged. If it was not, then the injury the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Freire v. Matson Navigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Zygmuntowicz v. American Steel & Wire Co. of New JerseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Gardner v. StoutSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
- Anderson v. Hotel CataractSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Rodgers v. Kemper Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- United States Casualty Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Gates v. Trans Video Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.