Legal Opinion
MARCOS DANIEL SANCHEZ v. SYNCHRONY BANK N.A.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided July 10, 2026No. 3:26-cv-03167Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 MARCOS DANIEL SANCHEZ, Case No. 26-cv-03167-BAS-VET 14 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART 15 v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS 16 SYNCHRONY BANK N.A., WITH PREJUDICE (ECF No. 3) 17 Defendant. 18 19 Presently before the Court is Defendant Synchrony Bank N.A.’s motion to dismiss 20 Plaintiff’s claims with prejudice (“Motion”). (ECF No. 3.) For the reasons below, the 21 Court GRANTS IN PART Defendant’s Motion. The Court dismisses all causes of action, 22 but declines to dismiss them all…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.