Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Leis v. Outcalt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1980No. 79-1231PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The question presented by this cause is whether the issuance of the writ of mandamus by the Court of Appeals compelling respondent to sentence the defendant in conformity with R. C. 2929.11 was proper.

In State, ex rel. Cleveland, v. Calandra (1980), 62 Ohio St. 2d 121, 403 N.E. 2d 989, this court affirmed the denial of a complaint for a writ of mandamus in a cause involving the refusal of a trial judge to impose the mandatory sentence required by Section 619.09(B)(1) of the Cleveland city ordinances. This court held that the prosecutor possessed a plain and adequate remedy at law under R. C.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sibarco Corp. v. City of BereaOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State ex rel. City of Cleveland v. CalandraOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State ex rel. Corron v. WisnerOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State ex rel. Moraites v. GormanOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State ex rel. Gargallo v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. HancockOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State ex rel. LTV Steel Co. v. GwinOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. VaughnOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. State ex rel. Corrigan v. McAllisterOhio Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API