Legal Opinion
O'Hagan v. Kracke
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 4, 1937PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtZolleb, J.
The facts here are not disputed. They have been submitted by stipulation of counsel. In view of that stipulation, which is a clear and comprehensive recital of the facts, I deem it unnecessary to refer to them in detail herein. These stipulated and agreed facts, however, do present several questions of law, to aid in the disposition of which counsel for the respective parties hereto have argued orally before the court and have submitted memoranda in support of their arguments.
This is an equitable action for an accounting, and plaintiff, in his. amended complaint, demands judgment “ that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Matter of WentworthNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Vohmann v. . MichelNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Van der Stegen v. Neuss, Hesslein & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Central Trust Co. v. GaffneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re the Estate CordNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- In Re FainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Gonzales v. Personal Collection ServiceWyoming Supreme Court · 1972
- Avery v. BenderSupreme Court of Vermont · 1956
- Vogulkin v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.