Gonzales v. Personal Collection Service
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Guthrie
Appellee herein filed complaints against Belle Gonzales and Bertie Brown for accounts due the Memorial Hospital of Laramie County, alleging that these accounts had been assigned to it for collection. Both appellants answered, setting up the defense that appellee was not the real party in interest because such an assignment on a contingent fee basis was constitutionally impermissible. Appellant Gonzales further set up as a defense that she had no means to pay for her hospitalization and that under the statute she was to be furnished these services free.
The parties entered a stipulation…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- First National Bank v. FordWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
- Ditto v. Ditto Investment CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Bowsky v. SilvermanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Takahashi v. Pepper Tank & Contracting Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1942
- Burton v. School Dist. No. 19Wyoming Supreme Court · 1934
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Collins v. Memorial Hospital of Sheridan CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
- Schoeller v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Union Pacific Resources Co. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Hancock v. Stockmens Bank & Trust Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- Yale-New Haven Hospital v. MatthewsConnecticut Superior Court · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.