Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company v. Pyle

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1975PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

An understanding of this case necessitates a recital of the history of previous litigation as established by the pleadings. Plaintiff brought an action against the defendants Pyle. The circuit court found for the Pyles and plaintiff appealed the adverse judgment. The Supreme Court reversed the trial court, ① and directed judgment to be entered in favor of plaintiff. The judgment was for $31,559.19, including attorney’s fees in both courts in the approximate sum of $2,700.

Subsequently the trial court dismissed a second case brought by plaintiff against the defendants Pyle and awarded…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Yorton v. Milwaukee, Lake Shore & Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Baumwald v. Two Star Laundry Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  3. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. MausOregon Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. EacretCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  2. Delaney v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. Dentel v. Fidelity Savings and Loan AssociationOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Ketcham v. SellesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. Welsh v. CaseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API