Legal Opinion
Scott v. Scott
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 27, 1983PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
190 N.J. Super. 189 (1983)
462 A.2d 614
DOROTHY M. SCOTT, PLAINTIFF,
v.
EDWIN A. SCOTT, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division Bergen County.
Decided April 27, 1983.
Seymour Chase for plaintiff (Chase & Chase, attorneys).
James A. Major, II for defendant (Major & Major, attorneys).
KRAFTE, J.J.D.R.C. (temporarily assigned).
The question presented is whether this court abused its discretion in permitting defendant to offer unrestricted testimony at the time of trial despite orders striking his answer and defenses and dismissing all his pleadings for failure to provide discovery and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Douglas v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Reilly v. PerehinysNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Johnson v. JohnsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- Metric Investment, Inc. v. PattersonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Perry v. CrundenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Slowinski v. Valley Nat. BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Jugan v. PollenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Georgis v. ScarpaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Clementi v. ClementiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- MARIA A. ROTH VS. STANLEY ROTH (FM-13-0078-16, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018