Legal Opinion

Radford v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)

Decided October 11, 2001No. 11-01-00077-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McCALL, Justice.

Upon his plea of guilty, the trial court convicted appellant of possession of methamphetamine and assessed his punishment at confinement for two years in a state jail facility. We reverse and remand.

In two points of error, appellant argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized from his home. In reviewing a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress, appellate courts must give great deference to the trial court’s findings of historical facts as long as the record supports the findings. Guzman v. State, 955 S.W.2d 85…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Loserth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  4. State v. KlimaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. State v. Steelman, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Parker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. Parker, Christopher ChadCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  3. State v. SteelmanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. State v. SteelmanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API