Zebrowski v. Warner Sugar Refining Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Voobiiees, J.
The trial resulted in a judgment of nonsuit, and the propriety of the court’s action in ordering it forms the basis of the argument of the plaintiff in error.
The plaintiff, about thirty years of age, a Pole, speaking and understanding English imperfectly, having been in this country but three years, had been employed by the defendant in its sugar refinery to wash hags, for about ten months before ¡.he happening of the accident which resulted in the injuries for which the suit was brought, and during which time he had been accustomed to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ford v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Sutherland v. . the Troy and Boston R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Feil v. West Jersey & Seashore RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. CarruthersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
- Johnson v. Devoe Snuff Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Reed v. Ridout's Ambulance, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Shimp v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Canonico v. Celanese Corp. of AmericaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Hull v. DavenportWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Johnson v. Bates & Rogers Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916