Legal Opinion

Carter v. Carter

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 18, 1949No. 32570PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

For the purposes of this decision we will concede, but not decide, that the court was correct in overruling the motion to strike the plea of res judicata. We do this for the reason that after a careful consideration and examination of the record we find that there is not sufficient evidence on behalf of the defendant, either oral or documentary, to sustain the plea of res judicata. We are not unmindful of the fact that the issuance of the execution itself carries with it the presumption that the execution attached to the plea is based on the principle that the officers concerned in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lunsford, Maxwell & Co. v. Malsby & AverySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Glaze v. BogleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Butler v. Tifton, Thomasville & Gulf Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Haber-Blum-Bloch Hat Co. v. FrieslebenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  5. Mound City Roofing Tile Co. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fountain v. TidwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  2. Trust Co. of Georgia v. S. & W. CAFETERIACourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  3. Saturday v. SaturdaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  4. Housing Authority of Atlanta v. MercerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  5. Saturday v. SaturdayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API