Legal Opinion
Colt Co. v. Hiland
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 18, 1926No. 16926PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. “Where the seller of a lighting plant, which must be set up and installed in the house of the purchaser before it can serve the use intended, procures another person to contract with the purchaser to set up and install the plant, to which contract the seller is not a party, the person thus procured by the seller to install the plant is, when installing it, performing services beneficial to the seller, in that the performance of such services enables the seller to do business with and contract with the purchaser. The installer, therefore, when performing such services, although he does so…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Metcalf v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Albany Phosphate Co. v. Hugger Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Dolan v. LifseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Burkhalter v. Perry & BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Chappell v. Western RailwayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Powell v. Ferguson Tile & Terrazzo Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Grant v. Fourth Nat. Bank of ColumbusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
- Whitley v. PatrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Stein Steel & Supply Co. v. Goode Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Robertson v. Laughlin Insulation Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.