Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Blair

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 23, 1932No. 4509PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSparks, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

The statutes involved in this appeal are Revenue Act of 1921, c. 136, 42 Stat. 227, 233, 246, §§ 210, 211 (a) (1), 219 (a) (3, 4), and so much thereof as is applicable is set forth in the margin. 1

The only question presented for our determination is whether the law will permit the trust incoine devised to respondent by his father’s will to be assigned by him prior to his actual receipt of it.- If this question be answered in the affirmative, the ruling of the Board is correct; if it be answered in the negative, respondent is properly chargeable with the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Nichols v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Spindle v. ShreveSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Steib v. WhiteheadIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Wagner v. WagnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Bennett v. BennettIllinois Supreme Court · 1905

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Town of Atrisco v. MonohanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Arundel-Brooks Concrete Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
  3. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. BlairCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
  4. Hudson v. JonesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1938
  5. St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API