Legal Opinion
Qingdao Maycarrier Import & Export Corp., Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided December 13, 2013No. Slip Op. 13-149; Court 13-00142PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge:
Plaintiff Qingdao Maycarrier Import & Export Co., Ltd. (“Maycarrier”), moves for judgment on the agency record contesting defendant United States Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) determination in Fresh Garlic From the People’s Republic of China: Final Rescission of Anti-dumping Duty New Shipper Reviews; 2010-2011, 78 Fed.Reg. 18,316 (Mar. 26, 2013) {“Final Rescission”). Commerce and defendant-intervenors Fresh Garlic Producers Association, et al., oppose May-carrier’s motion. For the following reasons, Maycarrier’s motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
In 1994,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Lyng v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Haixing Jingmei Chemical Products Sales Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- Zhongce Rubber Grp. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Dongtai Peak Honey Industry Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014