Legal Opinion
Sidaris v. Runyon
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided February 27, 1997No. Civil Action 96-D-003-NPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DE MENT, District Judge.
Before the court is the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, filed December 3, 1996. The Plaintiff responded in opposition on January 13, 1997. The Plaintiff also filed a supplemental response on January 17, 1997. After careful consideration of the arguments of counsel, the relevant ease law, and the record as a whole, the court finds that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is due to be granted.
JURISDICTION
Based upon 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343, the court properly exercises subject matter jurisdiction over this action. The parties do not…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Florence v. RunyonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1997
- Dollar v. Shoney's, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1997
- Luckiewicz v. PotterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Blankenship v. Buchanan General HospitalDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2001
- Boothe v. HendersonDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.