Legal Opinion
People v. Pendelton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 1, 2008PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Hudson, J.), dated August 9, 2006, as, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the defendant is designated a level two sex offender.
In establishing the appropriate risk level determination under the Sex Offender Registration Act, the People bear the burden of proving the necessary facts by clear and convincing evidence…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. HardyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. LawlessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. MarreroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. NavarroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. ArguetaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. DunnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.