Legal Opinion
People v. Navarro
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 19, 2014PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*836Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn J.), dated October 26, 2012, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the defendant is designated a level two sex offender.
In establishing the appropriate risk level determination under the Sex Offender Registration Act (hereinafter SORA), the People bear the “burden of proving the facts supporting the determinations sought by clear and convincing evidence” (Correction…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. MingoNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. PettigrewNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. BrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. LawlessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. AtkinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. DallasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. SesayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. PriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- People v. PrinceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025