Legal Opinion

Bakker v. Ætna Life Insurance Co. of Hartford

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammer, J.

Plaintiffs, an infant and his father, obtained judgments against James D. Ryan, insured by the defendant, the former in the sum of $30,000 for injuries and the latter for $4,000 for loss of services. Both claims arose out of the same automobile accident. Interest and costs have been added to each judgment.

In this action plaintiffs seek to recover from the defendant so much of their respective judgments as is covered by the defend*164ant’s liability policy. Plaintiffs claim that they are entitled in the infant’s action to the sum of $10,000 and in the father’s action to the sum of $4,000, with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Psota v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Janneck v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Brustein v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Halsted v. Globe Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Izzo v. Colonial Penn InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Standard Accident Insurance v. NewmanNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Gaouette v. Ætna Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  4. Jackson v. Citizens Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  5. Dillon v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API