Legal Opinion
Standard Accident Insurance v. Newman
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 24, 1944PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtErnest E. L. Hammer, J.
This action is for a judgment declaratory of the rights of the parties under an automobile liability policy of insurance. The facts have been stipulated in an agreed statement which is in the record. It is there agreed:
“ That prior to the commencement of the within action, Samuel Zinman, as administrator of the goods, chattels and credits of Edith Newman, deceased, brought an action in the Supreme Court, Bronx County, against Maurice Newman and others to recover damages for her death in the accident of August 16, 1941 as a result of the alleged negligence of one or all of the defendants named.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Mitchell v. . Rochester Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Mertz v. MertzNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Littlewood v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Archer v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Whitfield v. Empire Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- In re Maureen G.New York City Family Court · 1980
- Williamson v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- American Surety Co. v. DiamondNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. ThacherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.