Legal Opinion
Gaouette v. Ætna Life Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 28, 1938PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarswell, J.
The defendant insurance company issued a policy which gave one Eiduson, the insured, indemnity coverage of “ Limit one person $5,000. Limit one accident $10,000 ” in the event he was cast in judgment as a consequence of the operation of his automobile.
*389Plaintiff obtained a judgment for $1,146.50 against Eiduson for loss of services suffered as a result of injuries inflicted on his wife. As a consequence of the same accident, the wife obtained a verdict for $5,000. The defendant insurance company paid the wife’s judgment. It refused to pay the judgment of the plaintiff husband; whereupon he…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bakker v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Floyd v. Consolidated Indemnity & InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Bakker v. Ætna Life Insurance Co. of HartfordNew York Supreme Court · 1933
- Bakker v. Ætna Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
3Cited by10 opinions
- Izzo v. Colonial Penn InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- McGovern v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Sossamon v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
- County of Chemung v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1985
- Williams v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.