Legal Opinion
Springfield v. City of Little Rock
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided May 28, 1956No. 5-964PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
J. Seaborn Holt, Associate Justice.
This litigation involves the right of the City of Little Rock to condemn and order the removal (or razing) of 16 dwelling units located on four adjoining city lots, each 50 ft. x 140 ft., and numbered Lots 1, 2,-3, and 4 in Block 194, City of Little Rock, all owned by appellant, M. D. Springfield. The city, following an inspection of the above property, filed complaint in which it alleged that said property had been condemned by Ordinance No. 9814 enacted May 9, 1955, and after describing each of the 16 units further alleged that all had “been allowed to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Geurin v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
- City of Stuttgart v. StraitSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
3Cited by20 opinions
- Phillips v. Town of Oak GroveSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- City of Little Rock v. LinnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- City of Paterson v. Fargo Realty Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Skallerup v. City of Hot SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- Kirkham v. City of North Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.