Finnegan v. Finnegan
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*763TRAYNOR, J.
In 1943 plaintiff secured a decree of separate maintenance awarding her all 'of the community property and $100 per month for the support of the minor son of the parties. On defendant’s appeal the decree was affirmed as to these provisions but reversed insofar as it ordered a sale of certain property by a receiver. (Finnegan v. Finnegan, 64 Cal.App.2d 109 [148 P.2d 37].) Thereafter the parties entered into a property settlement agreement, which by stipulation was adopted as the basis for a final judgment of separate maintenance. The stipulation provided that “the provisions of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Dexter v. DexterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Fox v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Cardinale v. CardinaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Messenger v. MessengerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Hull v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Taliaferro v. TaliaferroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Bowers v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
- Helvern v. HelvernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.