Legal Opinion

Helvern v. Helvern

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 14, 1956No. Civ. 16516PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

The main problem involved in this case is whether a separation agreement entered into by a husband and wife dividing their property and providing for the support of the wife was an integrated property settlement agreement which cannot be modified, or whether the support provisions are severable, and therefore subject to modification. The trial court ruled, as a matter of law, that the agreement was an integrated property settlement agreement and not subject to modification. The husband appeals. We agree with the interpretation of the trial court.

The facts are as follows:

On February 4, 1948,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Adams v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Dexter v. DexterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Flynn v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Fox v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Hill v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Messenger v. MessengerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. DuValle v. DuValleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  3. Washington v. WashingtonMontana Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Kelley v. KelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Grolla v. GrollaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API