Legal Opinion

Cato v. Modglin

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1976No. 36709PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RENDLEN, Judge.

Plaintiffs William and Lorenia Cato appeal from the judgment entered on directed verdicts for defendants Williams and Hicks and on the jury verdicts for defendants Aisie Modglin and Florence Dollinger, Ad-ministratrix of the Estate of Paul Dolling-er. This case arises from a multi-car accident during a heavy snowstorm January 26, 1969.

Points numbered IV and IX of plaintiffs’ brief, not raised in the motion for new trial, are thus not preserved for review. Rule 78.07 V.A.M.R. Plaintiffs points V, VI and VII are not in compliance with Rule 84.04(d) as they fail to tell us wherein…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nelms Ex Rel. Nelms v. BrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  2. Hildreth v. KeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Pedigo v. RoseberrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  4. Schmittzehe v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  5. Graham Ex Rel. Bodine v. ConnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Cantrell v. Superior Loan Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Hensic v. Afshari Enterprises, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Jordan v. Robert Half Personnel Agencies of Kansas City, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Daniel v. Indiana Mills & Manufacturing, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. State Ex Rel. Webster v. Missouri Resource Recovery, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API