Legal Opinion
S. F. Nat. Bk. v. American Nat. Bk. of L. A.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 18, 1907No. Civ. No. 281PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff placed a draft with the defendant for collection, the defendant forwarded the draft to a bank at Arizona for collection, which bank collected the draft, failed, and no part of the proceeds has ever reached any of the parties hereto. The action was tried by the court on an agreed statement of facts; judgment was rendered therein for plaintiff, from which judgment the defendant appeals.
The agreed statement of facts, in part, is as follows: The Judson Dynamite and Powder Company, of San Francisco, held a check, dated December 17, 1903, on the Sandoval National Bank of Nogales,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mills v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- PRESIDENT AND DIRECTORS OF THE BANK OF WASHINGTON v. Triplett & NealeSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Sahlien v. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
- Farmers' Bank & Trust Co. v. NewlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
- Davis v. First National Bank of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Luckehe v. First Nat. Bk. of MarysvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Security Etc. Bk. v. Southern Etc. Bk.California Court of Appeal · 1925
- Spokane Valley State Bank v. LutesWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Security Commercial & Savings Bank v. Southern Trust & Commerce BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- City National Bank v. Cooper & GriffinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.