State v. Anderson

OPINION

EDWARD D. MULALLY, Judge.

Appellant Duane Anderson was convicted by a jury of receiving stolen property, Minn.Stat. § 609.53, subd. 1(1) (1984), and handling stolen livestock of a value in excess of $300, Minn.Stat. § 609.551, subd. 2 (1984). Appellant’s primary contention on appeal is that the evidence was insufficient to prove that he knew that calves found on his farm were stolen. We affirm the convictions.

FACTS

In the summer of 1985, appellant, his wife, and five children lived on a rented farm in Hancock, Minnesota. Appellant contends that in May and June, 1985, he advertised on two…