Legal Opinion
State v. Rasinski
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 6, 1991No. C4-90-1010PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellant Gerald Charles Rasinski challenges his conviction and sentence for two counts of criminal vehicular operation resulting in death. He assigns a number of errors including evidentiary rulings, sufficiency of the evidence, the sentence of the court, and the court’s denial of his demand to execute his stayed sentence. We affirm as modified.
FACTS
Early on the morning of July 4, 1989, appellant’s van collided with a vehicle driven by Brett Callan while traveling eastbound on Highway 8 in Chisago County. Mr. Callan and his passenger, Wayne Faris, were killed in the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Virginia Consuelo-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. BiasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. RaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. RasinskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Pageau v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002