Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. City of Cininnati. v. Geiger

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 28, 1930Published

1Opinion of the CourtKunkle, J.

This is a proceeding in which the re lator, the city of Cincinnati, seeks a- writ of prohibition against the defendants, who constitute the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.

The relator in its petition, in brief, states that in May, 1930, the council of the city of Cincinnati passed an ordinance designated as No. 294-1930, by which it regulated the rates which could be charged by the Union Gas & Electric Company for natural gas. A copy of this ordinance is attached to the petition. The date said ordinance took effect, it is stated, was June 19,1930. The petition further states that on or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Walcott v. WellsNevada Supreme Court · 1890
  2. State Ex Rel. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. DuffyOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Equitable Surety Co. v. Cicero School Board of FinanceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. State Ex Rel. Schorr v. VinerOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Ex parte OldhamOhio Court of Appeals · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API