Reich v. State Highway Department
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs were injured in separate accidents as a consequence of the alleged negligence of defendant, the State of Michigan. Notice of the injury and intent to make a claim was not filed with the proper governmental agency within 60 days after the accident by either set of plaintiffs as required by MCLA § 691.1404 (Stat Ann 1969 Cum Supp § 3.996 [104]). Consequently, the court of claims granted defendant’s motion for accelerated judgment. Plaintiffs appeal and argue that the notice requirement violates their constitutional rights to equal protection and due process of law. The Knapp case…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Davidson v. City of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Fitzpatrick v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Tomlinson v. TomlinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Trbovich v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
- Iron Street Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Reich v. State Highway DepartmentMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Johnson v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Fry v. Willamalane Park & Recreation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- Streng v. Board of MacKinac County Road CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
- Friedman v. Farmington Township School DistrictMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.