Legal Opinion
Sentience Studio, LLC v. Travelers Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 21, 2004No. 03-56387PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Sentience Studio and David E. Kronemyer (collectively the “Sentience appellants”) sought a declaratory judgment that a Travelers insurance policy (the “Policy”) issued to some of their corporate business partners provided coverage for their claims of stolen and damaged property. In particular, Sentience sought coverage for damages to its studio equipment, and Kronemyer sought to recover damages caused by the extirpation of his name from the credits of several independent films— most notably My Big Fat Greek Wedding—for which he claims to have been the executive producer. The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Shade Foods, Inc. v. Innovative Products Sales & Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- United States v. City of Tacoma, WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Intermetal Mexicana, S.A. v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Harper v. Wausau InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Florists' Mutual Insurance v. Ludy Greenhouse Manufacturing Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
- Ad Adver. Design, Inc. v. Sentinel Ins. Co.District Court, D. Montana · 2018
- United National Insurance v. Mundell Terminal Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2012
- Cincinnati Holding Company, LLC v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- Circus Circus LV, LP v. AIG Specialty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.